Welcome, Guest. Please Login
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
  To join this Forum send an email with this exact subject line REQUEST MEMBERSHIP to bbcstaff@gmx.com telling us your connection with the BBC.
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Lament for Ceefax (Read 9042 times)
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3268

Lament for Ceefax
Apr 8th, 2012, 9:05am
 
This is taken from The Times:

Half a minute – I’m going to miss the slow news of Ceefax
It broke the Challenger disaster as fast as any tweet would today
by Paul Dunn
Published at 12:01AM, April 7 2012


When they switched off the BBC Two analogue signal in London and the Home Counties this week, they were also switching off a little piece of television history.

Not the channel itself, which will of course carry on, but a precious bit of Ceefax. Analogue BBC Two was the only place where you could read the Ceefax business news pages. So coverage on the original rolling news channel is being dismembered and soon there won’t be any at all.

When the remaining analogue channels go, Ceefax will die with it. Frankly, the hard to navigate replacement service behind the red button is no substitute.

It is easy to mock teletext news, with its blocky Etch A Sketch graphics made up of garishly coloured squares (the weather maps are a particular joy) and every story reduced to four paragraphs of equal length. But that is to forget how revolutionary it was 30 or so years ago in the pre-internet age.

Of course, Ceefax has its frustrations, not least the 30-second pause for the screen to switch over on multiple-page stories, which always seemed aimed at particularly slow readers — although modern TV sets had a clever way round that. But in the days when you had to wait until six or ten o’clock to find out what was happening in the world, half a minute’s wait for the punchline to a big story was no time at all.

And that very slowness sometimes works to the service’s advantage. The poet Simon Armitage has spoken about the joys of watching cricket on Ceefax and he is not alone. There is something about the slow ticking over of the pages as the score builds run by run that is perfectly suited to the rhythm of our summer game. Many a gardener will leave the TV switched on to a county match and sneak surreptitious glances through the living room window as they go about their summer mowing and weeding.

In the mid-1980s, when I worked for ITN’s rival news service for Oracle, teletext was cutting-edge technology: journalists were allowed to input their copy directly on to the screen without the intervention of typesetters or technicians. There was no deadline (at least not during broadcasting hours; these were the days before breakfast television, let alone 24-hour programming) and the bare bones of every story had to be on screen within seconds of its breaking, ideally before the opposition.

Usually news came on “the wires”: old-fashioned teleprinters that chattered endlessly and loudly away in the corner of the newsroom, but we also monitored the “live feeds” that were streamed into the building for the grown-ups who worked on the main ITN broadcast bulletins. The battles of the miners’ strikes, the IRA Brighton bomb and Michael Heseltine’s walkout from the Thatcher Cabinet were all covered in this way.

But most dramatic of all, on January 28, 1986, we were half-watching routine shots of the launch of the space shuttle Challenger being beamed in from Florida when it disintegrated on screen before us. The teletext “150” newsflash pages broke that dreadful news to Britain as fast as any tweet would today.

It’s true that teletext was, like the fax machine or the CD and the DVD, interim technology, but it was the first instant news service, constantly updated and liberated from the straitjacket of newspaper delivery boy or programme scheduler and the grandfather of today’s websites and 24-hour news cycle. I may be the last person watching, but I shall miss it.

Paul Dunn is assistant comment editor of The Times and worked as a teletext bulletin writer at ITN from 1984-86


Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Roundabout
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 214

Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #1 - Apr 10th, 2012, 5:02pm
 
I too miss the text and info on the BBC 2 analogue channel, but in a more unusual way. Despite the switch in the Midlands to digital we have kept our VHS recording system but now BBC 2 has gone there is no automatic timer update signal so the VCR clock has to be regularly checked manually. Another backwards march forwards! Angry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love YaBB 2!
Posts: 80

Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #2 - Apr 10th, 2012, 6:25pm
 
Now there is an opportunity for some bright spark to think of a way to feed a cefax type time signal to the analogue recorders. My hard drive recorder has also lost its time setting ability. I did suggest this some time ago on another web forum but got no interest Huh

There must be quite a few people with recorders that would benefit from a time signal to automatically set the clock when the recorder is powered up.

John
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Roundabout
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 214

Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #3 - Apr 11th, 2012, 6:29pm
 
I don't think there is any problem getting the signal to the appropriate gear it's the source of the signal that is the challenge! Surely it must already be in amongst all the signals in the digital broadcasts.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3268

Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #4 - Apr 18th, 2012, 8:12am
 
There is a cleverly-done tribute to Ceefax by Matthew Engel on the BBC News site.
You can read it by clicking here.
(You have to scroll through to read the whole thing).
Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Director_General
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline



Posts: 18

Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #5 - Apr 19th, 2012, 8:19am
 
Can anyone explain why the French, Germans, Belgians, Dutch, Swiss, Austrians etc. etc. manage to retain a simple useful ceefax-like service alongside their digital pictures?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
JohnW
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 283
Eggington, Bedfordshire
Gender: male
Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #6 - Apr 19th, 2012, 9:50am
 
Isn't the 'Digital Text' feature adequate, as is available through Freeview or the Red button?
To me, that provides pretty much all the features that Ceefax had, but in a far more readable font. And it's very much quicker!
True, you don't get as much to the display page(!) but it's not too much trouble to press the down or forward arrows to read the remainder/next story! And, if you know the Page No of what you regularly want (such as Shares, etc.), you can input that directly via the remote.

One advantage I see of this (on my Sony set at least!) is that you get Picture in Picture function (i.e. you can see the normal channel - in a reduce picture size - whilst reading the texts).
Back to top
 
John-Westbury  
IP Logged
 
Amigo
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 174

Re: Lament for Ceefax
Reply #7 - Apr 19th, 2012, 4:08pm
 
In the 70's I remember helping to demonstrate Ceefax at UK Party Conferences in Blackpool during the lunch-time interval. The remote control was wired directly to the back of the large TV receiver.

It was difficult to explain to all and sundry why there was a delay between clicking the page number and it actually appearing on he screen.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print