Welcome, Guest. Please Login
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
  To join this Forum send an email with this exact subject line REQUEST MEMBERSHIP to bbcstaff@gmx.com telling us your connection with the BBC.
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Murdoch malevolence (Read 5554 times)
david en france
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 112
Old Whittington, Derbyshire.
Gender: male
Murdoch malevolence
Jul 7th, 2011, 11:02am
 
In 1993, many will recall, The Sun revealed the contents of the Queen's Christmas Message ahead of transmission. As Senior Events Producer it was my job to promulgate the sound recording to all BBC outlets (World Service , networks, etc) as well as external users such as ITV , IRNand SKY. It was all done under strict secrecy and embargo. As a result of the leak I was interviewed by senior Met detectives and was "under a cloud" and the same "cloud" flew over the SMs etc involved. I told them and my bosses that I believed SKY were the perpetrators, allowing fellow Murdoch employees access to it. Nothing was ever proved but it left a damaging scar on my record. What's the betting, in view of the current shenanigins, that it was Murdoch's dirty tricks? Does anyone have any light to throw on it?  I'd be glad to clear my name.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
JohnW
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 283
Eggington, Bedfordshire
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch malevolence
Reply #1 - Jul 19th, 2011, 3:34pm
 
David F, I believe at least one (maybe two) ex-BDMs may read this forum.

I clearly remember Mike Todd "commenting" about that "content leak" ahead of the transmission: throughout my operational time in LCR (with the Continuities) I clearly remember the strictest of security measures being in force regards those tapes, but by '93 (having spent 11 months acting for one of the BDMs in '92) I was back managing in LCR. But 'tis my memory that we (within the good ship) all believed it to have been a leak through Sky at that time.

Even to this day, I find it very strange that some of the content gets a 'preview' in News bulletins prior to the Tx itself. but that seems to be the case with almost every item of News: it all seems to be "pre" announced these days! I'm thoroughly fed up of hearing what the PM (or some other dignitary) "will say" when they're due to make that big announcement "later". Why can't we just wait until they've said it!
But I guess the News reporters are not considered to be properly "on the ball" unless they know in advance these days.

I wonder if they knew just what the News Corp "trio" were going to say/not say in the HoC this afternoon!!
Back to top
 
John-Westbury  
IP Logged
 
david en france
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 112
Old Whittington, Derbyshire.
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch malevolence
Reply #2 - Jul 19th, 2011, 7:59pm
 
Thanks John. I've tried to interest a couple of corres in News in re-opening the story but can't find any takers. It's history, of course, but when I had to face "early retirement" in '94 I would far rather have hung onto my job. You are so right, we did maintain extremely strict security and I always chose the most senior SMs to do the dubbing and topping and tailing and never let the accompanying script out of my sight. As you say, it's now descended into farce and you wonder why we ever bothered.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
TomT
Ex Member





Re: Murdoch malevolence
Reply #3 - Jul 20th, 2011, 7:25am
 
Way back when the Transcription Recording Unit multi copied the Speech it was done backwards in case anyone heard the content!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
david en france
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 112
Old Whittington, Derbyshire.
Gender: male
Re: Murdoch malevolence
Reply #4 - Jul 20th, 2011, 1:33pm
 
That doesn't surprise me in the least!  Although I suspect some of the older SMs would be so good at hearing sound played backwards they'd dnatsrednu yreve drow !   LoL
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print