Welcome, Guest. Please Login
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
  To join this Forum send an email with this exact subject line REQUEST MEMBERSHIP to bbcstaff@gmx.com telling us your connection with the BBC.
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Licence fee row (Read 5758 times)
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3254

Licence fee row
Oct 12th, 2005, 6:17am
 
The BBC's case for an increased licence fee has attracted a very hostile response in the Press.  This is the leader in the FT:

Auntie's got a nerve
Published: October 12 2005 03:00



The BBC's bid to raise the television licence fee by inflation plus 2.3 per cent each year from 2007 would raise this poll tax on every home with a television to about £180 a year by 2013. With Auntie's share of viewers in steady decline, this is a staggering proposal.

The Beeb's detailed justification of its demands makes no reference to the inconvenient but critical issue of its dwindling audience share. Yet its share of total viewing has fallen from more than 40 per cent in 1998 to just above 30 per cent this year. Meanwhile, digital channels are now watched almost as much as BBC1 and BBC2 combined.

Yet its case for continuing to raise the licence fee above the rate of inflation until 2013 rests on plans to spend an extra £5.5bn over that period on programming and digital services. To its credit, £3.9bn of this will come from internal efficiency gains. But even a cursory examination of the details calls into question the legitimacy of the much touted "value" for licence holders of a fee of £3.50 a week.

Improving content quality, at a cost of £1.6bn, is the most expensive part of the proposal. So it should be: we all want better quality television. But when some of this money is allocated to reducing repeats, is it something viewers should be paying for?

The £600m aimed at increasing "local relevance" could probably be better spent. The BBC is losing viewers to commercial broadcasters not renowned for superior regional offerings.

Another £1.4bn is allocated to base costs, such as sport. The BBC is barely even a competitor for mighty sports broadcasters such as BSkyB and some portion of £1.4bn is not going to change this. It could, however, increase the income of sports organisations, to the detriment of its competitors who have no guaranteed licence fee income.

The most charitable view is that the extra £1.6bn requested from the licence fee is an opening shot in the forthcoming bargaining process with the government. But even if the Beeb intends to make concessions, it is unlikely to envisage a figure below inflation, which is precisely what the government should insist on. Fees have already been rising faster than inflation and in spite of this generous arrangement the BBC has continued to lose viewing share. It is time it looked internally for the solution to its woes.

The government must also ensure that 2007 is the beginning of the end of the licence fee, which is simply un­tenable in a multi-channel world. Once the switch-over is complete, the BBC could introduce pay-to-view and tender - along with other broadcasters - for a share of any finance for public service programmes.

Finally, government must reconcile itself to funding Digital UK, the company handling the digital switch-over. It is the government that stands to benefit from auctioning the released spectrum: it should pay the bill, rather than dumping it on all licence-payers.
Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3254

Re: Licence fee row
Reply #1 - Oct 12th, 2005, 6:22am
 
This is the BBC's Press Release on the licence fee:

BBC launches case for new licence fee settlement

Date: 11.10.2005


The BBC today unveiled its case for a new licence fee settlement to ensure that it continues to deliver value to licence payers as we move towards a fully digital Britain.

Its vision, endorsed by the Government's Green Paper earlier this year, is for high quality original content and services that will be universally available to everyone, irrespective of age or income.

With digital switchover, all licence payers will be able to access all BBC output, wherever they live in the country, thanks to the commitment to build a universal digital infrastructure for TV and radio.

Excellent content and services will be received on normal television and radio sets, but also on mobile devices and via broadband, with all public service content available for free for up to seven days after first transmission.

The BBC will also be opening up its archive, built over many years from the public's licence fee payments, and will invest in High Definition TV to ensure it is available to all and not confined to subscription services.

New technology will also allow the BBC to deliver state-of-the-art local television services and radio stations, as well as investing in production and a presence around the UK, representing the country more effectively than in the past.

Today's announcement puts a cost on the vision over seven years and shows how the BBC will meet more than 70 per cent of those costs itself.

It is the first time the BBC has made its case for a new licence fee settlement so openly and it follows public consultation and scrutiny by the BBC Governors and their independent advisors, as well as public response to the Government's Green Paper proposals.

The BBC proposes a licence fee increase from April 2007 based on RPI plus 2.3 per cent a year. In today's prices, this means £150.50 a year per household by 2013, compared to the current £126.50*.

That amounts to an average annual £3.14 increase per household, excluding RPI, from the start of the next Charter, while the licence fee is still declining steadily as a proportion of disposable income.

It does not include the costs of targeted help for special groups when the analogue signal is switched off.

The funding decision will be taken by the Government next year as part of the process around the BBC's new Royal Charter starting in 2007.

This will ultimately determine how the BBC can fulfil its public purposes, meet audience expectations and lead the next phase of the digital revolution.

The additional spend required to meet the vision outlined in the Green Paper will total £5.5 billion over the seven-year period to 2013/14.

However, the BBC will meet more than 70 per cent of this itself, not from additional licence fee funds.

Self-help measures already underway at the BBC, including job losses, rationalising processes and commercial disposals and dividends, will contribute £3.9 billion, leaving a funding gap of £1.6 billion which could be closed by an RPI +1.8% settlement.

However, to meet additional industry costs related to Switchover, such as the marketing costs of DigitalUK (SwitchCo) and spectrum tax, the total increase needed is a further RPI +0.5%, taking the total to RPI +2.3%.

MORI research conducted in March this year assessed audiences' appetite for the plans. Over 80 per cent saidt was important for the BBC to build out digital.

Earlier research on the audience's willingness to pay showed that 81% believe the licence fee represents good value for money with over 40% being prepared to pay twice the current licence fee or more.

Launching the proposal, the BBC's Director-General Mark Thompson said: "Our audiences, rightly, have very high expectations of the BBC. They themselves are driving incredible change by the way they want to access our programmes and services.

"The BBC needs to transform itself to ensure we are providing the very best content, accessible to and valued by everyone across Britain, and the licence fee will help us achieve our vision to be the best creative digital broadcaster and content provider for audiences in the world."

BBC Chairman Michael Grade said: "Our document Building Public Value outlined the BBC's vision for serving the public in the digital age.

"The Government's subsequent Green Paper endorsed and refined that vision after consultation with the public. This bid has been thoroughly and independently scrutinised by the Governors. We commend it to Government as an efficient business plan designed to meet licence payers' expectations at the lowest cost."

*The predicted licence fee at the end of the current Charter is £128.50 in today's prices based on the current LF settlement.

The Equation:

Costs

Quality Content - £1.6 billion

(Learning; Drama, Comedy/Ents, Arts, Music, Journalism, Local services)

Digital Services - £1.2 billion

(On-demand; Navigation and Search; active engagement)

Digital Infrastructure - £0.7 billion

(DTT/DAB build out; Free Satellite; Internet distribution; HDTV)

Local Relevance - £0.6 billion

(Local TV; new radio stations, OpenCentres/ Buses, Out of London)

Base costs increase - £1.4 billion

(super-inflation in broadcast costs etc)

= £5.5 billion

Self Help

Efficiencies on overhead and production processes - £2.6 bn Modernising Licence Fee collection channels - £0.2 billion Capturing household growth - £0.7 billion

Commercial dividends - £0.4 billion

= £3.9 billion

Funding Gap = £1.6 billion

Closing the gap = RPI + 1.8%

Switchover costs

Digital UK costs - £200 million

Spectrum Tax £300 million

= £500 million cumulative

Total Funding = RPI + 2.3% per year from 2007/2008 to 2013/14

This will mean a licence fee per household of £150.50 a year by 2013, the equivalent of an average annual increase of £3.14 per household, each year from the start of the next Charter.

Annual licence fee increase (in 2005/2006 prices, excluding RPI):


Now      £126.50
2006/2007      £128.50
2007/2008      £131.00
2008/2009      £134.00
2009/2010      £137.50
2010/2011      £140.50
2011/2012      £143.50
2012/2013      £147.00
2013/2014      £150.50



Notes:

The last settlement:

The current licence fee settlement was made in 2000 and is based on RPI +1.5 per cent. The actual colour licence fee this year is £126.50 per household.

Before the last settlement, the Government set down new priorities for the BBC:

To help build digital Britain by providing new high-quality digital services on radio and TV (BBC THREE, FOUR, CBBC, 1Xtra, bbc.co.uk etc) and use these to drive digital take up by the whole population (Freeview/FreeSat);

To improve existing services (new investment in drama, specialist factual, news)

To expand educational provision (Digital Curriculum, GCSE Bitesize, children's channels);

To better reflect the UK in an era of devolution (more investment in nations and regions, more coverage of devolved institutions).

The licence fee – key facts:

A TV Licence is a legal permission for the named person or anyone living at the address of the licence to install and use television receiving equipment to watch television programme services at the premises listed on the licence.

Last year, TV Licensing collected £2,940 million in revenue for the BBC, which is an increase of £142 million on the previous year. Of this, £80 million was due to inflation, £43 million to the above inflation increases in the licence fee and £19 million from collection improvements.

Estimated levels of evasion are down to a record low of 5%. The cost of collecting the TV licence continues to fall. It now stands at 5.2% of licence fee income; when the BBC took over responsibility for managing the licence fee from the Home Office in 1991 this figure stood at 6.2% of income. In addition, the number of licences in force has grown by 26% (from 19.6 million to 24.7 million) over the same time.
Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3254

Re: Licence fee row
Reply #2 - Oct 13th, 2005, 8:49am
 
This is taken from Broacast Online:

Jowell probes BBC licence fee claims
Geoff White
13 October 2005



The government has hired a major firm of accountants to probe the financial thinking behind the BBC's bid for an inflation-busting licence
fee rise.

The corporation this week publicly set out its arguments for a rise of 2.3% above the rate of inflation - which could mean the licence fee
rising to more than £200 by the time of the next Charter review in 2016.

It has now emerged that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) hired PKF accountants to look through the BBC's figures and that
the firm will now scrutinise its licence fee bid in the run-up to a settlement.

The use of PKF - hired by the DCMS in July - will come as depressing news for the corporation. The firm was last used in 2000 when former
culture secretary Chris Smith ended up cutting its request for £700m in extra funding to £200m, and requiring it to find £1bn of self-help money.

The media secretary Tessa Jowell has asked PKF to look into the corporation's costings and value for money plans, as well as looking at
commercial services such as BBC Worldwide, and provide a financial analysis to the department. The firm will report back to the DCMS over
the next few months, in time to feed into its decision on the licence fee settlement, expected to be announced next spring.

News of PFK's involvement came after BBC chairman Michael Grade and director general Mark Thompson held a press conference to unveil their
case for the 2.3% settlement.

They argued the extra money is needed for the BBC to take a leading role in building digital Britain, and also to make more hours of original
programmes to cut down on repeats. In total the BBC is asking for an extra £5.5bn, of which 30% would be paid for from the licence fee
increase, with the rest coming from cost-cutting measures - notably the 3,780 job cuts.

The figures have been questioned by the Satellite and Cable Broadcasting Group (SCBG) which researched the costs of digital infrastructure for
its submission to the House of Lords select committee on the BBC in June. The group predicted that the licence fee would have to rise to
£200 in order to cover the cost of digital switchover alone.

Source:broadcastnow.co.uk
Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3254

Re: Licence fee row
Reply #3 - Oct 13th, 2005, 8:52am
 
Alone among the national Press, The Guardian was supportive of the BBC's case:

Licensed to serve

Leader
Wednesday October 12, 2005


It is a sign of a new self-confidence at the BBC that, after its traumas with the Blair government, the corporation is now boldly asking Labour for a prolonged 2.3% above-inflation rise in the licence fee to fund the transition to the digital age. The BBC feels confident partly because it is delivering efficiencies, including 7,000 job cuts; and partly because this is really a bill for services the government wants it to introduce anyway. The BBC has figures to show that 81% of people think the licence fee - currently £126.50 - is good value for money and that 41% would be happy to pay twice as much. With the fee now the equivalent of 35p a day - even by 2013, the planned £150.50 would only equate to a daily 41p - this represents very good value, especially considering the range of services the BBC offers and the deft way it has set a world standard in internet development and in promoting digital terrestrial television after the private sector failed.

About £1.6bn of what the BBC is asking for will be used to boost the quality of output by increasing the number of original dramas (costing £534,000 an hour) while cutting back on repeats (costing only £13,000 an hour). Another £1.2bn will go on digital services including the exciting prospect of an on-demand service for television (recent programmes and archives) delivered over the internet. The rest will go on sports and other rights, regional expansion and the adoption of digital media throughout the country including a free satellite project with ITV for those who cannot receive Freeview.

It is always possible to argue that the BBC is asking for too much. Few will be surprised if the government cuts the bid back a bit. It will also be interesting to see what stance the Tory leadership candidates take. But the bottom line is that the BBC needs and deserves to go fully digital as soon as possible. Britain leads the world in this technology. If the lead is maintained there will be spin-offs elsewhere. Though the digital age has led to an explosion of channels catering for all tastes, the stage is still dominated by private sector giants like the Rupert Murdoch empire (now stepping up its internet spending having, unlike the BBC, underestimated its importance) and by publicly-funded channels such as the BBC. At a time when many of our traditional industries have lost their international reputation, the BBC has managed to maintain a blue chip brand of global excellence by combining technological innovation with editorial independence. It has proved a winning combination that is well worth backing for the future.
Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Administrator
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 3254

Re: Licence fee row
Reply #4 - Oct 16th, 2005, 7:32am
 
This piece by former BBC producer Tim Luckhurst is taken from the Independent on Sunday


The TV licence fee heads for the zapper

The BBC wants another hefty increase but it knows the public may not wear it much longer

By Tim Luckhurst
Published: 16 October 2005


Once again, the BBC wants a hefty rise in the license fee. Predictably, the press has been jousting about whether the public gets value for money, with most critics balking at director-general Mark Thompson's request for a hike 2.3 per cent above inflation.

But a bigger issue lies behind all this. What will happen next time, after the 10-year, 2006 deal runs out? In an age when the nation gathered around to watch the patrician BBC address the nation, the licence fee made sense. But in a multi-channel, digital world, the universal licence fee is much harder to justify.

A senior BBC source says "This time, the Government was right. It could have set up another Royal Commission on the licence fee, but there was no point because nobody had a realistic alternative. Even our commercial rivals agreed that we should remain licence-fee funded. Next time, the game will change." The need to find a new funding mechanism is not as far away as it might seem. Negotiations for the 2016 deal will begin in just over a year's time.

Tory MP Nigel Evans, a member of the Commons Media Select Committee, says evidence about viewing habits will be much firmer next time. "As the percentage of viewers watching BBC programmes declines, the BBC will have a problem. It will be harder to justify a universal fee."

As Professor Justin Lewis of Cardiff University puts it, "in the age of multi-channel, the BBC will struggle to retain share. The regressive aspect of the licence fee has always been a problem. It will be a bigger problem when a substantial proportion of the audience can prove that they do not watch or listen to BBC services."

Officially, the BBC knows that the share of viewing achieved by its mainstream channels will decline, but it emphasises that the public is willing to pay the licence fee anyway. More people, it says, are paying the fee than ever before, although critics say that has more to do with how it is collected than a fondness for forking out for Auntie.

Privately, the BBC knows that change has to come. One top source at the corporation admits: "The survival of the licence fee in the next decade will depend on how much affection the public feels for the BBC. Nobody would invent the licence fee now. It is not a modern idea."

So what is? The BBC will not concede the principle of universality. But universal payment need not mean uniform payment. "It might become possible for the BBC to create a basic package consisting of the main national television and radio channels and then charge extra for add-ons," says Mr Evans. "The trail of information will exist to create a variable fee with people who want access to more BBC services paying more. I would pay more for specialist political news."

It will soon be possible to build a set top box capable of charging per hour of BBC television watched, but that would generate pressure to maximise audiences by dumbing down. The political consensus that has just preserved the universal flat rate licence fee is about to disintegrate. Politicians will find it impossible to justify as fresh millions of constituents pay for digital subscriptions but ignore BBC services. Some at the BBC hope to retaliate by launching new services until there is a BBC station for every taste. But such intense cultivation of niche markets infuriates commercial broadcasters, threatens local newspapers and alarms MPs.

As soon as its new charter takes effect in December 2006, the BBC will come under unprecedented pressure. By helping the Government to make digital television universal, the BBC is accelerating the pace of fragmentation. The consequences for its own funding are unavoidable.

Once again, the BBC wants a hefty rise in the license fee. Predictably, the press has been jousting about whether the public gets value for money, with most critics balking at director-general Mark Thompson's request for a hike 2.3 per cent above inflation.

But a bigger issue lies behind all this. What will happen next time, after the 10-year, 2006 deal runs out? In an age when the nation gathered around to watch the patrician BBC address the nation, the licence fee made sense. But in a multi-channel, digital world, the universal licence fee is much harder to justify.

A senior BBC source says "This time, the Government was right. It could have set up another Royal Commission on the licence fee, but there was no point because nobody had a realistic alternative. Even our commercial rivals agreed that we should remain licence-fee funded. Next time, the game will change." The need to find a new funding mechanism is not as far away as it might seem. Negotiations for the 2016 deal will begin in just over a year's time.

Tory MP Nigel Evans, a member of the Commons Media Select Committee, says evidence about viewing habits will be much firmer next time. "As the percentage of viewers watching BBC programmes declines, the BBC will have a problem. It will be harder to justify a universal fee."

As Professor Justin Lewis of Cardiff University puts it, "in the age of multi-channel, the BBC will struggle to retain share. The regressive aspect of the licence fee has always been a problem. It will be a bigger problem when a substantial proportion of the audience can prove that they do not watch or listen to BBC services."

Officially, the BBC knows that the share of viewing achieved by its mainstream channels will decline, but it emphasises that the public is willing to pay the licence fee anyway. More people, it says, are paying the fee than ever before, although critics say that has more to do with how it is collected than a fondness for forking out for Auntie.

Privately, the BBC knows that change has to come. One top source at the corporation admits: "The survival of the licence fee in the next decade will depend on how much affection the public feels for the BBC. Nobody would invent the licence fee now. It is not a modern idea."

So what is? The BBC will not concede the principle of universality. But universal payment need not mean uniform payment. "It might become possible for the BBC to create a basic package consisting of the main national television and radio channels and then charge extra for add-ons," says Mr Evans. "The trail of information will exist to create a variable fee with people who want access to more BBC services paying more. I would pay more for specialist political news."

It will soon be possible to build a set top box capable of charging per hour of BBC television watched, but that would generate pressure to maximise audiences by dumbing down. The political consensus that has just preserved the universal flat rate licence fee is about to disintegrate. Politicians will find it impossible to justify as fresh millions of constituents pay for digital subscriptions but ignore BBC services. Some at the BBC hope to retaliate by launching new services until there is a BBC station for every taste. But such intense cultivation of niche markets infuriates commercial broadcasters, threatens local newspapers and alarms MPs.

As soon as its new charter takes effect in December 2006, the BBC will come under unprecedented pressure. By helping the Government to make digital television universal, the BBC is accelerating the pace of fragmentation. The consequences for its own funding are unavoidable.
Back to top
 

The Administrator.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print